Beyond the Badge: From Research to Practice: Building Safer Schools Through Competence, Connection, and Preparation

SPEAKER_01 0:03

We've spent four episodes asking some very important questions. What does a school resource officer really do? Why do social emotional competencies matter for adults with authority? How can de-escalation change the direction of a conflict? And what does research tell us about the relationship between SRO preparation and school violence? Research only matters if it influences practice. So today we're asking the most important question of the entire series. What do we do with what we know? Safer schools require more than security measures. They require adults who know how to recognize, communicate with, respond to, and de-escalate students. Welcome back to the Road to an Effective Classroom Environment. I am your host, Dr. Lashanta, known as that classy sassy consultant. This is episode five, the final episode of my special series, Beyond the Badge, Rethinking School Safety Through Social Emotional Competence. This series grew out of my doctoral research, but I was never meant, it was never meant to stay in the language of academia. I wanted to bring the conversations into schools, into leadership meetings, professional development, in conversations between administrators and school resource officers, and in spaces where decisions about student safety are actually made. Here's what I believe this entire series has been building toward. School safety is not only a security issue, it is a human interaction issue. That doesn't mean security doesn't matter, because it absolutely does, but it means security alone is not enough. So let's start with the SRO selection. If you're placing an officer inside a school, we should ask more than just does this person know the law? Can this person respond to emergencies? Can the person enforce school-related legal responsibilities appropriately? These are all valid questions and they should be asked and they matter. But we also need to think about: can this person build relationships with young people? Can they communicate with adolescents? Can they remain composed when challenged? And can this person distinguish between disrespect and danger? Can the person avoid unnecessary power struggles? Can the person work collectively and collaboratively with teachers, counselors, administrators, and families? And most importantly, does this person actually want to work with young people? Very valid question. A school assignment should not simply be treated as another post. Working inside a school requires a different kind of professional presence. SRO selection should consider not just technical competence, but relational competence. Once we select the right people, we have to prepare them for the environment they're entering. Schools are very unique, and every school is different. Every school district has differences. It has character. Students are developing. Students do not have everything figured out. They still have developing minds. Emotions are high. Peer attention matters to them. Embarrassment matters to them. Identity and belonging matter. A response that works with an adult in one setting may not work the same way with a 14-year-old in a crowded hallway. Training should include adolescent development, social emotional competence, de-escalation, trauma-informed practices, bias awareness, communication under pressure, conflict resolution, restorative approaches, mental health awareness, and clear legal and ethical boundaries. This does not replace traditional law enforcement training. It complements it. The more tools an officer has, the more options that officer can consider before a situation escalates. Training through NASRO, which is the National Association for School Resource Officers, allows school resource officers to be trained in understanding the development of school-aged children to be able to interact with students daily. And this is one organization that was talked about in my dissertation, and is also an organization that was mentioned to those school resource officers, and the training that they received fell under that umbrella, fell under that organization.

SPEAKER_00 5:22

Administrators and SROs need a real partnership.

SPEAKER_01 5:28

So this is there is a leadership issue that's involved. Administrators and SROs should not wait until something goes wrong to define their relationship. That is not the point in time for someone, for either party to try to one up or to show who has more authority or who should be making a decision in a situation that happens. They need clarity before the crisis. Who's going to handle what? When does the administrator lead? When does the SRO take over? What constitutes a disciplinary issue? What constitutes a safety threat? What happens when a student is emotionally dysregulated but not dangerous? And what happens when staff want the SRO involved, primarily to obtain compliance? What are the communication expectations during a crisis? And what happens after that incident? These conversations should happen ahead of time because ambiguity during a crisis creates confusion. And confusion during a crisis can create escalation. A strong administrator SRO partnership is not based on proximity, it is based on clarity, communication, trust, and shared expectations. Now that I now I want to go further and broaden this conversation because this series has focused on SROs, but safety does not belong to one person. Teachers influence escalation, administrators influence escalation, counselors influence escalation, front office staff, coaches, bus drivers. Everyone and anyone who interacts with students contributes to the emotional climate of the school. So professional development on deregulate de-escalation and emotional regulation should not be limited to just the SRO. Every adult should have at least some shared understanding of how to recognize escalation, how to regulate their own responses, how to use calm, concise communication, and how to protect student dignity. And also how to reduce unnecessary audiences, when to step in, when to step back, and when to get help. Those interactions matter. A relationship built on a calm Tuesday may become important during a difficult Thursday. And this does not mean becoming a student's friend. Professional boundaries still matter. It means becoming a trusted known adult rather than an unfamiliar authority figure who only appears during a crisis. Every school needs clear safety procedures. But those procedures should not only answer who do we call, where do we go, what happens next. They should also include de-escalation. When appropriate, who speaks first, who clears the area, who reduces the audience, who communicates with the student, who contacts the family? When should the counselor become involved? When should the SRO become involved? When is immediate law enforcement action necessary? And when is the situation primarily behavioral, relational, or emotional? Clear protocols help adults avoid reacting impulsively. They create a shared playbook, and during high pressure moments, a shared playbook matters. Sometimes the immediate incident is only part of the problem. The fight stops, the student leaves, the hallway clears, and everyone returns to class. But what happens next? Restorative practices can help schools examine harm after safety has been restored. Questions that might be included are what happened, who was affected, what harm occurred, what needs to happen to make things right, what needs to change so this doesn't happen again. That does not eliminate consequences, it adds learning. A consequence may end an incident. A restorative process can help address the damage left behind. That distinction matters. So when you look at data, schools they collect a lot of discipline data. Schools will look at the number of fights in a year, referrals, suspensions, arrests, threat assessments, and they may look at that year, look at those incidents and that data annually over a three-year period, five-year period. But we should go deeper. We should look at where are the incidents happening, what time of day, which students are repeatedly involved, what adult interactions tend to precede escalation? Are there patterns by location, grade, student group, or type of incident? How often is the SRO called? Why is the SRO called? How often does the SRO involvement lead to arrests, de-escalation, referral, or no further action? Are there disparities? Are some situations being treated as safety issues when they are actually discipline issues? And are our interventions reducing repeated incidents over time? Data should not simply document what happened. Data should help us learn what to do next. When an incident occurs, schools often ask, what did the student do? And we must ask that question. It's necessary, but it's incomplete. We should also ask, what did the adults do? What worked? What escalated the situation? What reduced the tension? Was the protocol followed? Was the right person involved? Could the situation have been addressed earlier? Did the student understand the expectations? Did the adults communicate clearly? What training gap did this incident expose? And that's not blaming adults. It's about improving systems. You have to think about and reflect on practices that are in place and how practices were played out. If we only study the student, we may miss the lesson the organization needs to learn. So if I had to turn this entire series into one simple leadership framework, it would be select intentionally, choose SROs and staff who demonstrate relational and professional competence. Train them comprehensively. Include those social emotional competencies, communication, adolescent development, bias awareness, and de-escalation. Connect early. Build relationships before crisis. Clarify roles. Define administrator, staff, counselor, SRO responsibilities before an incident occurs. Respond intentionally. Use the least escalatory appropriate response while maintaining safety. Restore when appropriate. Address harm, accountability, and relationships after the crisis. Review the data. Study the patterns, the outcomes, disparities, and repeated incidents, and improve continuously. Use what each incident teaches you to strengthen the system. This is how research begins. This is how research begins to move into practice. So as we close this series, I want you to think about your own school, not your safety plan, not your cameras, the locks, the metal detectors, but think about your people. If a student is angry tomorrow, if a conflict begins in the hallway, if a student refuses, if an administrator calls for assistance, do the adults involved have the competencies necessary to lower the temperature? Do they know their roles? Do they trust one another? Do they have relationships with students? Do they know when to communicate, when to intervene, and when to step back? Because every safety plan eventually depends on people. Over these five episodes, we've gone beyond the badge. We've talked about the role of the school resource officer. We've examined the adult social emotional competence. We've explored de-escalation. We've looked at research, and now we've moved from research into practice. My hope is that this series leaves you with a broader understanding of school safety because safety is not only created by policies, it's not only created by equipment, it's not only created by the presence of law enforcement, but safety is created through preparation, through communication, through relationships, through emotional regulation, through trust, and through clear leadership. Adults who understand how their own behavior influences what happens next. That's important. So I want to leave this entire series with one challenge. The question isn't simply whether we have an officer in the building, the question is whether every adult responsible for safety has the competencies necessary to create it. That includes the SRO, the administrator, the teacher. That includes me. That includes you. Connection before crisis. I'm Dr. Lashonta, and this has been Beyond the Badge: Rethinking School Safety through Social Emotional Competence, a special series for the road to an effective classroom environment. Thank you for listening. And wherever you lead, teach, serve, or protect, go beyond the badge.